[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Insu f fi ci ent i s 9Bxh6, Qh4+ 10 g3 , Qxh6 1 1 Qf7+, Kd8 12 Rd1, Be7 andBl ack has no probl ems.9 Ne2 enabl es Bl ack to force adraw wi th 9." " Bc6 10 Qe6+, Qe7 11 Qc8+, Qd8 12 Qe6+, etc.Bc610 Qe6+ Qe71 1 Qc8+ Qd812 Qxd8+ Kxd813 Bxh6 gxh614 0-0-0+ Kc7The best assessment we can give i s '" uncl ear'".Chapter Ni ne: The 2 N c3 Variation 12 1B( 1 d4, f5 2 N c3, d5)3 8g51· ýÿýÿ ýÿt ýÿ ttýÿNow:81 3.c682 3." " g683 3.Nf6813.c64 e34 Nf3 is an al ternati ve.4.5 h4Wh i te hopes to develop pressure on the Ki ngsi de.Qui et pl ay of fers on l y stati c equal i ty.h65.5.Nd7?! 6 8d3 forces 6." Ndf6 when Bl ack' s Ki ng­si de development is congested.6 Bf4 Nd76.Bg7 7 h5, g5 8 8e5, Bxe5 9 dxe5, Nd7 10 f4 l edto a cl ear advantage for Wh i te i n Bronstein-Menvi elle, LasPal mas 1972.7 Nf3 Ngf67.8g7 8 Rh3!? followed by Rg3 puts annoyi ng pres-su re.122 Dutch De fense8 Ne5 Rg89 Bd39 Be2 i s worth at tent i on.Nxe 59.10 Bxe5 Ng411 Bg3 e5Bl ack must re act be fore Wh i t e pl ays Qe2 fol l owedby f3.12 Be212 dxe5?!, B g7 offers l ess t han nothi ng.e412.13 Qd2 Bb413.Bd6 i s al so pl ayabl e.14 a3 BaS15 Bf4 g516 hxg5 hxg51 7 Bxg417 Bg3 also l eads to nothi ng.17.fx g418 Be5 Qe7The posi ti on i s roughl y equal.82(l d4, f5 2 N c3, d5 3 Bg5)3.g6General l y t hi s vari ati on ari ses after the move order1 d4, f5 2 Bg5, g6 3 N c3, d5.Chapter Ni ne: The 2 Nc3 Variation 1234 h4!The sharpest try for advan tage.4 " " " Bg7Bl ack doesn't have ti me for 4.c6 on accou nt of 5h5 (5.h6 6 hxg6).5 e3Also promi si ng is 5 Qd2 when t here can follow5.c6 6 Nf3, Nd 7 (6.Be6 7 Qe3, Bf7 8 h5, Nd7 9 0-0-0, Qa510 Bf4 gave Wh i te the i ni t i at i ve i n Duric- Psakhis, Banj aLuka 1985.6.h6 7 Bf4, Nd7 8 Rh3 al so looks favorabl e toWh i te) 7 h5! , h6 8 hxg6, hxg5 9 Rh7! , Rxh7 10 gx h7, Ngf611 Qxg5, Kf8 ( l l.Kf7 12 Qxf5) 12 Qh4! , Kf7 13 Nxg5+,Kg6 and Wh i te had a vi rul ent attack for the pi ece, He nl ey·Savage, New York 1983.5.c65." Nf6 6 h5!, Nxh 5 7 Rx h5, gxh5 8 Qxh5+, Kf8 9Nf3, c6 (9.Be6 10 Bh6, N d 7 11 Bxg7, Kx g7 1 2 Qg5+, Kf713 Qh6! , Vaiser- Knezevic, Havana 1985) 10 Bd3 gi ves Wh i testrong pressu re for t he Exchange.6 Qf3!An i dea of the Sovi et GM Kochi ev and an I m­provement over 6 Bd3.6.Be6Or 6.h6?! 7 Bf4, Nd7 8 Qg3 , Nf8 9 Nh3 , Nf6 10Be2 with a cl ear advantage for Wh i te.7 Bd3 Nf68 Nge2 Nbd7124 Dutch Defe nseRg89 h5!9 ".Nxh5 10 Rx h5, gx h5 11 Nf4, Bf7 12 Nxh5 gi vesWh i te a power ful attack.hxg610 hxg61 1 0-0-0Wh i te hel d a sl i ght advantage because of hi s moreacti vel y placed pi eces, Kochiev-Mal ani uk, USSR 1984.83( 1 d4, f5 2 Nc3, d5 3 Bg5)Nf6Thi s leads to a very uni nspi ri ng posi ti on.4 Bxf6The si mplest and best way for Wh i te to cl ai m anadvantage.Less convi nci ng i s 4 f3 , h6! 5 Bh4 (5 Bx f6, ex f6l eaves Wh i te's dark squares vul nerable) 5 " " " Nc6 6 Qd2, e6and Bl ack has a sati s factory posi ti on.4.exf65 e3 c66 Qf3 Bd67 Bd3 g6Chapter Ni ne: The 2 N c3 Variation 1258 h3More accu rate than 8 Nge2, Nd7 9 h3, Ne5! 10 dxe5,fxe5 11 e4, fxe4 12 Nxe4, dxe4 13 Bxe4, Rf8 wi th a re­spectabl e posi tion for Bl ack.8.Qe7Or 8.0-0 9 0-0-0 (9 g4, fxg4 10 hxg4, f5! gi vesBl ack good pl ay) 9." a5 10 h4, h5 11 Nh3, Kg7 12 Nf4, a413 Rh3, a3 14 b3 , Rh8 15 Nce2 , Na6 16 c3 , Nc7 17 Rg 1!,Qe7? 18 Rg3, Rh6 19 Nxg6!, Rxg6 20 Rxg6ch, Kxg6 2 1 g4,Kf7 22 gx f5, Ke8 23 Qxh5ch, Kd8 24 Qh8ch, Ne8 25 h5, b526 h6, Ra7 27 Rg8, Bd7 28 h7, Qf7 29 Rg7! and Wh i te woni n a fe w more moves, Ramayrat-P.Wh itehead, SanFrancisco 1987.I t shoul d also be menti oned that 8.h5?! i s ratherdubi ous si nce Wh i te can pl ay 9 g4! an yway! The gameLo ffler- Pantos, Belgrade 1987 conti nu ed 9.fxg4 10 hxg4!,Bxg4 1 1 Qxg4!, hxg4 12 Rxh8ch, Bf8 13 Bxg6ch, Kd7 14Nge2, Kc7 15 Nf4, Kb6 16 Bf5, Na6 17 a3, Qd6 18 b4 wi t hstrong pressu re on Bl ack' s posi tion.9 Nge29 g4, f4 10 0-0-0, fxe3 1 1 Ret, 0-0 12 Rxe3, Qg7 i snot clear.Nd7Perhaps Bl ack shoul d try 9.Na6!? 10 a3, Be6 11 g4,fxg4 12 hxg4, 0- 0- 0 when matte rs are not so cl ear.On the other hand, 9.0- 0? i s defi ni tel y bad.10 h4! ,h5 11 Nf4, Kg7 ( 11.Bxf4 can be consi dered.) 12 Nce2 (Or12 Qg3, Bxf4 13 Qxf4 wi th an edge.) 12.Rh8 (Forced si nce12.Be6 13 Rh3, Bf7 14 Rg3, Kh7 15 Nxg6!, Bxg6 16 Rx g6,Kx g6 17 Qxf5ch, K f7 18 Qg6ch, Ke6 19 Bf5 mate must beavoi ded.) 13 Rh3, Rh6 14 Rg3, Be6? (Byrne and Medni sgi ve 14.g5! as best when 15 Nxh5ch, Kh8 16 hxg5, fxg5 17126 Dutch De fenseBx f5! sti l l favors Wh i te.) 15 Nxe6, Qxe6 16 Bx f5, Qe7 17Nf4, Bxf4 18 Qx f4 , Wh ite i s wi nni ng, Christi ansen- D.Gurevi ch, USA 1986.10 g4 fx g41 1 hxg4 Nf8Necessary to prevent the th reatened Bxg6+.12 Nf4 Bxf412.Rg8 13 NcxdS, cx d5 14 Nx dS i s crushi ng.Be613 Qxf4Whi te has a smal l but cl ear advan tage.c( 1 d4, rs 2 Nc3, dS)3 g4?!Wh i te gambi ts a wi ng pawn i n order to grab morespace i n t he center.3.Nf6!Despi te the ol d adage " i n order to re fute a gambi t,you have to accept i t", we beli eve t hi s sol i d developi ngChapter Ni ne: The 2 Nc3 Variati on 127move i s best.Wh i te has concrete compensati on for thepawn after 3.fx g4 4 Bf4, Nf6 5 Qd3, c6 6 h3, Na6 7 a3,g6 8 hxg4, Bxg4 9 f3 , Be6 10 Nh3 Kosl owski - Lazarevi c, Riode Jane iro 1979.4 h34 g5, Ne4 i s cl earl y good for Bl ack.4.c5Bl ack has al ready assumed the i ni t i ati ve.Wh i teshou l d bury t hi s l i ne i n the Arcti c somewhere.After 2 Nc3, Bl ack nee d not pl ay.d5, but can si m­pl y develop hi s K-si de vi s.Nf6 and.e6.Thi s wi l l t rans­pose i nto li nes from the Staunton Gambi t.128 Dutch DefenseCHAPTER TENV rious White 2nd MovesaWe wi l l look at ( 1 d4, f5):A 2 Bg5 The Sharp Vari ati onAl 2.c5A2 2 [ Pobierz caÅ‚ość w formacie PDF ]